The Talking Lion

Friday, August 12, 2005

Pragmatism at it's Finest

So, it's easy to talk about how things suck down there in Africa. Most recently, it's been Sudan and Niger that have been hit pretty hard. Spreading awareness about the situation is one thing, but actually coming up with some ideas that will help solve some problems -- now that's something to write home about.

WashPost, please tell the people:

HUMANITARIAN crises are seldom just humanitarian: Almost always, the malnutrition and the misery have political causes. The brutal wars in Sudan and Congo account for those countries' appalling civilian death tolls. Political repression explains the hunger in North Korea and Zimbabwe. Even the HIV pandemic reflects the failure of politicians to challenge gender inequality and sexual taboos.

Niger's food crisis has its own political dimension. The government has been criticized for playing down the crisis -- it speaks of a food shortage rather than a famine -- and for resisting calls to distribute free food. International financial institutions, which urged a value-added tax on food and imposed budget controls that discouraged the government from maintaining emergency food stocks, also deserve some of the blame. Even so, Niger's crisis is less political than many. This landlocked country of about 11 million is a democracy. There is no war going on there. Some 2.5 million people need emergency assistance because of natural disasters more than politics: a swarm of locusts that ate much of the millet harvest, followed by a drought.

Usually, natural disasters attract a generous response. The tsunami last Christmas was a prime example, and earthquakes and hurricanes generally prompt individuals and their governments to open their wallets -- or at least to pledge generously, even if they don't always deliver. But Niger has not even been that fortunate. As early as last November, the government and the U.N. World Food Program appealed for mergency food aid and money; only Luxembourg responded. The United Nations followed up with a second appeal in March and a third in May. Only recently has the money begun to come.

Okay, so what should we do? how can we actually help these people in the future?

If Niger's largely unpolitical emergency cannot trigger prompt sympathy, it's time to rethink the way relief is organized. The world depends on an ad hoc, pass-the-hat system; there's no standing ability to respond quickly when the first signs of disaster appear. This raises the cost of action. In the Sudanese province of Darfur last year, donors didn't provide enough relief before the onset of the rainy season, so part of their belated assistance had to be airlifted into the region at enormous expense. Similarly in Niger, the United Nations estimates that saving a life would have cost a dollar of aid back in November but may cost $80 or more now.

To avoid this waste of cash and lives, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan has proposed an emergency fund of $500 million from which to finance rapid response to future famines. In the wake of the oil-for-food scandal, the onus is on the United Nations to show that it can manage that sort of money without corruption; perhaps it cannot. But whichever institutional home one favors for it, the idea of a global famine fund makes sense.

Hmm, that actually sounds like a good idea. A pool of relief money that is ready to dole out when a crisis develops. That might actually make some sort of difference down there.

I understand the difficulty of determining what exactly should be certified as a real crisis, but I believe that figuring out crisis status will be a lot easier and take a lot less time than raising lots of money after the fact. If we're looking to save lives and help improve the way these people are living, I think this plan makes a lot of sense.

This could be somehting that the general public could contribute too as well, and it would give people a chance to donate money when they are better able to instead of shelling out whatever they can when the latest crisis hits. I may be naive, but I think that the U.N. can handle such a repsonsibility and this "famine fund" could really do a lot to help things.

It's far from a cure-all, but it's certainly a step in the right direction.


  • MSN Makes More Blogging, Aggregator Tweaks
    MSN is fleshing out its Weblogging and aggregator products by adding new features on a regular ... Sponsored by HP & Intel The Compliance Conundrum: Ensuring Regulatory Compliance AND Secure Messaging with Michael Krieger.
    A little different than most but that's what makes life interesting!

    Oh, by the way, I have a site. It really doeas a good job at covering related stuff.

    Drop by at your convenience.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Friday, 12 August, 2005  

Post a Comment

<< Home